Category Archives: Year

“Raindrops on Rotwein” Flight at Crush Wine Bistro in Anchorage

I indicated in my article on the wine bistro Crush in Anchorage, Alaska that we had their Austrian reds flight called “Raindrops on Rotwein”. The flight consisted of three Austrian reds made with typical Austrian red grapes: St. Laurent, Blaufränkisch and Zweigelt. All wineries have garnered some sort of international acclaim, be it in Falstaff magazine or Wine & Spirits. The flight was also really well composed, because the three grapes are connected:

The St. Laurent grape is in the same family as pinot noir. It is described as highly aromatic and is mostly grown in the Czech Republic, Austria and Germany. Blaufränkisch (literally “Blue Frankish”, also known as Lemberger) is a late ripening red grape rich in tannin, that is mostly grown in Central Europe. And finally, Zweigelt is a cross breed of the other two grapes which was created in 1922 by Mr. Zweigelt. It is now the most widely grown red grape in Austria.

I am not familiar at all with Austrian wines, let alone red wines. From what I gathered over the last years, Austria has made a tremendous comeback from its crisis days in the 1980s and a lot of my friends are really excited about Austrian wines. The few wines I have tried were Grüner Veltliner and Rieslings (what else?). My hometown winemaker also produces a St. Laurent that is decent, Nina likes it a lot. So when we saw that flight on the list, Nina and I decided to give it a try: two more grapes to knock off on our Wine Century Club application and the chance to try some reds from a region we knew practically nothing about drew us in.

Let me begin by saying that the tasting really challenged both of us. The wines were quite intense and different in many ways and not necessarily pleasantly so. It might be my underdeveloped palate or maybe I was just not expecting what ride I was in for…but to the wines:

Photo taken from the winery’s website

The first was a 2009 Sattler St. Laurent from Burgenland region. The Weingut Erich Sattler owns vineyards in what it describes as gravelly soil in the hot Burgenland region of Austria, around the village of Tadten. According to the website, the St. Laurent vines are over 40 years old. The winery’s stated goal is to make dense wines, and the St. Laurent ripened in steel tanks, staying on the lees for six months. It had 13% ABV.

In the glass, the St. Laurent was of a lighter red color, similar to a pinot noir. In the nose it was quite alcoholic, with plum and strawberry aromas. It smelled a bit unripe. In the beginning, this lighter bodied wine had a smooth mouthfeel to it, but soon peppery and bitter aromas came in that were increased by a significant amount of acidity. Add to that some burnt notes and the wine seemed quite unbalanced to me. When re-tasted later, the wine showed a bit more fruit (berries) and had a decent finish, but also seemed rather thin.

Photo Wine-Searcher

The second wine was a 2008 Prieler Johanneshöhe Blaufränkisch, also from the Burgenland region. Weingut Prieler is located in Schützen am Gebirge and its history goes back over 150 years. Prieler owns 20 hectares (around 50 acres) of vineyards. This particular vineyard is described as having brown loam soil with red pebbles, high in iron content. It also had 13% ABV.

In the glass, the wine had a ruby red color and showed beautiful viscosity. On the nose, I got earthy aromas of mushrooms and plum. The wine had a good, velvety texture but rather harsh tannins. The aromas we got were quite confusing: I thought I tasted salami (I swear to God!) and there seemed to be a cheesy note to it, too. Really weird. The finish was very short and quite bitter. All in all, this was a pretty harsh wine to me. It just did not work. Nina thought it was overripe overall.

Photo: CellarTracker

The third and last wine in the flight was a 2009 Glatzer Zweigelt Riedencuvée from the Carnuntum region. Weingut Glatzer is located in Göttlesbrunn in this Roman settled area of Southern Austria. Glatzer owns 54 hectares (133 acres) in a number of different vineyards. It focuses on red wines, with the largest crop being Zweigelt (20 hectares). This particular wine was grown on sandy loam soils and had between 12.5 and 13% ABV. It was aged for 9 months in 2000 liter casks.

In the glass, we got a darker ruby red wine. The nose was quite pungent, with aromas of sauerkraut, damp earth and burnt rubber. On the palate, this one had more weight to it than the other two. It had a velvety texture, but I could not get over the taste of burnt rubber that reminded me of everything that can go wrong in a pinotage; Nina remarked that she tasted ash. There were aromas of sour cherries and herbs, but the racing acidity in the end did not help it either. After 45 minutes I did get some strawberries, but the wine was just too sour for my taste.

I am not sure I went away from this tasting with a favorable view on the three wines we tried (re-reading my notes, I am pretty certain I did not). In hindsight, the first of the three was the most pleasant for me. Too bad that I thought it could only get better from there. Naturally, I was quite disappointed. I am now eager to try more Austrian wines, because these definitely did not cut it for me and I am sure there are some out there that are better suited for me. Having no real experience with Austrian reds, and also knowing a number of German reds that I find sub par, it is hard to know whether it is me or the wines…it was puzzling.

Has anyone tried Austrian reds and can point me to some I should try?

Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

2011 Dr. Hermann H Riesling and 2009 Dr. Hermann Erdener Treppchen Riesling Kabinett

Dr. Hermann wines

Dr. Hermann wines

As I mentioned in my last post,  at Crush wine bistro in Anchorage we had the lucky chance to try two rieslings by one of my favorite wineries in the middle Mosel region: Dr. Hermann. I wrote about the winery extensively here, so please check that out if you are not familiar with them.

The 2011 Dr. Hermann H Riesling is their entry level riesling made with grapes from the region. I have been a huge fan of that entry level wine, I thought the 2010 was stellar. When we tried this vintage in June 2011, it was not as vibrant as the 2010 I remembered but still a good $7 bottle (at the winery). At Crush, the wine presented itself a bit more settled. The nose had floral notes and some aromas that I can only describe as doughy (as in cake batter); actually quite pleasant. On the palate, the light-bodied wine showed honey and candied apricots and some pear with a decent enough acidity. In the finish, I got almonds. I still thought the wine tasted a bit too sweet, but it was enjoyable. I miss the 2010, but I can live with this vintage, too.

Dr. Hermann H Riesling

The 2009 Dr. Hermann Erdener Treppchen Riesling Kabinett presented itself as having aged quite nicely. In the past, Erdener Treppchen has been my preferred vineyard for this winery and this wine did not let me down (see a photo of the vineyard here). In the glass, we had a golden yellow, slightly amber wine. The nose showed some signs of that particular aroma that aged rieslings have (I don’t know how to describe it, a bit musty maybe), with detectable citrus aromas. On the palate, this lean wine had already contracted a bit and showed a beautifully round aroma of citrus, apricot and toffee with a medium finish that let on hints of vanilla. At first I was surprised by these signs of ageing because I had not expected them, but when I realized it was a kabinett and not a spätlese (as I had originally thought) I relaxed. A kabinett can show these signs after 3 years in the bottle. As it opened up further, it showed pineapple and red apples aromas, too. It really was quite beautiful and is right for drinking now.

Tagged , , , , ,

2010 Caiu a Noite Vinho Verde and 2011 King Estate Acrobat Pinot Gris

2010 Caiu a Noite and 2011 Acrobat Oregon Pinot Gris

2010 Caiu a Noite and 2011 Acrobat Oregon Pinot Gris

We were invited for at dinner party on our last Saturday evening in Alaska before flying back to Ann Arbor. The hosts had told us to bring wine and sent us a menu for dinner: broccoli, roasted lemon-herb chicken, mashed lentils with caramelized onions and balsamic vinegar. In my opinion, this dinner was screaming out for white wines. I guess a Côtes du Rhône would have worked fine as well, but with the lemon chicken I just felt safer with whites.

We headed over to the liquor store and I was thinking something along the lines of a Burgundy chardonnay. We kept checking the pretty decent wine selection when Nina had the idea to bring a vinho verde to start with. We couldn’t see any, so we asked the lady in the store who promptly sent us to the Chile wine section because Portugal was somewhere in South America…ah, well. I finally spotted a vinho verde, the 2010 Caiu a Noite. I had never seen that wine before, but it was $6.99 and since a bottle of vinho verde has yet to disappoint me, we picked it up.

With some uneasiness and the very limited selection of Burgundy whites I was convinced by Nina that we might want to look into pinot gris. I complained that I am not the person who brings pinot gris to a dinner party (I am not the fondest supporter of that grape). I saw some Oregon pinot gris and I decided that that might be a route to take. I have never had Oregon pinot gris before, so it was an experiment. The 2011 King Estate Acrobat seemed about right, and cost around $10.

Both wines turned out to be very good (as did dinner!). The 2010 Caiu a Noite Vinho Verde still had some bubbling going on, which I did not expect given that it is a 2010 vintage and vinho verde is usually meant to be drunk young. It had a great nose of fresh apple and citrus and in the glass showed these same apple aromas, a very slight sweetness backed up by a nice acidity. It was a really good vinho verde, probably one of the best I have had (better than the Trader Joe’s Vinho Verde Espiral, I think, because it was more rounded and less wild). I highly recommend this wine if you get a chance to try it.

The 2011 King Estate Acrobat Oregon Pinot Gris poured in a very light yellow color. The nose was a bit perfumy, but somewhat subdued. Not very expressive at first. On the palate the wine was beautiful. It had a nice body to it, was dry and showed some interesting fruit aromas of pear and apple. It had a nice length to it and was just incredibly smooth and wonderful to drink. I enjoyed it tremendously, and I loved that there are always wines out to positively surprise me. It also paired well with dinner. I have to try more Oregon wines, from what I hear this is a wine region that is producing wines that I will like. I am very excited about that prospect.

Tagged , , , , , ,