Tag Archives: review

Two More Reds: 2010 Lapostolle Canto de Apalta and 2006 Bennett Family Napa Cabernet Sauvignon The Reserve

Disclaimer: Both wines were provided as media samples by Wine Chateau. Opinions expressed are my own.

With the weather still being pretty splendid, but the evenings cooling down I have been digging more in my modest cellar. While a lot of the wines are white, there is a decent amount of reds by now, so I had the good fortune of pulling these two out this week.

2010 Lapostolle Canto de Apalta (Credit: http://www.lapostolle.com)

We first had the 2010 Lapostolle Canto de Apalta, a Chilean mix of 36% Carmenère, 31% Merlot, 18% Cabernet Sauvignon and 15% Syrah from Rapel Valley. According to the label, Lapostolle Winery was founded by a member of the family that has been producing the liqueur Grand Marnier for over six generations in 1994. The female winemaker, Alexandra Marnier Lapostolle, reportedly created this blend by selecting different lots from the estate’s 370 hectares. In total, the winery produces around 2.4 million bottles.  According to the website, 2010 seems to have been a rough year for Chile winemakers: a cooler and drier fall/winter 2009 with delayed bud break and persisting low temperatures. Throw in a major earthquake and everyone had their hands full. The wine has 14.1% ABV.

The wine showed itself in a deeper purplish red with a soft rim. It flowed noticeably heavy in the glass. I thought the nose was pretty, with jammy raspberries, branches, some maltiness and wet leaves. Yet, it also showed a decidedly perfumy nose with healthy acidic aromas. Nina thought the nose was wonderful. On the palate, the wine was way less acidic than anticipated from the nose. It had a light to medium body and a decent balance. The beginning and middle section seemed a bit too fruit-less for my taste, but there were hints of spice, pepper and a branchy finish. After a while, there appeared leather aromas, too. All in all a decent red wine. Not the most interesting or complex in my book, but definitely worth a try.

2006 Bennett Family Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon The Reserve

2006 Bennett Family Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon The Reserve

Wednesday night, we opened the 2006 Bennett Family Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon The Reserve. According to the label, the wine is produced by William Grant and Sons, a family of distillers. It has 14.5% ABV. The winery website provides a sheet for the 2005 vintage, according to which the vines are 15 years old and the wine spent 18 months in French oak, 60% of which were new. But to the wine:

In the glass, it poured in a dark crimson red. The nose was delicious, with blackberry and raspberry aromas, some balsamic and pepper. It also had a jamminess to it which I liked. On the palate, excellent mouth-feel with just the right amount of chewiness. Herbal and spice box aromas, a very well integrated acidity and good tannins. I thought this had a very good balance and depth. There were wood aromas and slight pepper towards the medium long finish. After a while, I got cocoa and bitter chocolate aromas as well as fennel and anis seed. Both Nina and I really liked this wine. You might know that I am not a big fan of single varietal Cabernet Sauvignon, but this one worked very well for me. It had depth and good flavors that kept bringing me back.

In my book, the Bennett Family was the clear winner between these two, especially given that they come pretty much at the same price point…

Both wines are available for around $20, for example from Wine Chateau:

2010 Lapostolle Canto de Apalta

2006 Bennett Family Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon The Reserve

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,

Two Fall Reds: 2010 Bartenura Rosso di Montalcino and 2005 Coume del Mas Collioure Quadratur

Just some tasting notes today. Work continues to be crazy, but I had these two quite different wines lately and wanted to share my impressions…with fall approaching, we’re all looking for soothing reds, right?

The first was the 2010 Bartenura Rosso di Montalcino DOC. Rosso di Montalcino, the little brother of Tuscany’s famed Brunello di Montalcino, can be an affordable and good choice if you are longing for some Italian earthiness in a younger wine. Made from 100% Sangiovese (like Brunello) and grown in the same area, the main difference is that a Rosso only needs to spend six months in oak (compared to two years for Brunello) and one year of total ageing before release.

Bartenura is a big, Italian-wide producer mostly known for its Moscato in a blue bottle (which I was not aware of when I picked up the bottle…) and its current website does not list the Rosso di Montalcino. We bought the bottle at Costco where it retailed for $12, which is definitely on the lower end for a Rosso di Montalcino.

In the glass, the wine showed a lighter red color. The nose was full of pecan pie, slightly burnt cookies, blackberry, cherry and unidentifiable vegetables. That left quite the impression! On the palate, the wine was weirdly bubbly (which was not noticeable when looking at the glass), with initially strong acidity. There were some earthy and cherry pie aromas, but in the middle it showed surprising bitter aromas. The finish was so, so. I don’t know. Something seemed off balance with the wine. The acidity was too strong for me. There were moments that were better, but overall I don’t think I will buy this again…

2005 Coume dell Mas Quadratur

2005 Coume dell Mas Collioure Quadratur

The second wine we had was a 2005 Coume del Mas Collioure Quadratur from Languedoc-Roussillon in France. I bought this wine during a blow out sale on Last Bottle Wines mostly because of its logo. I loved that! The price was right ($12). According to the wine guide Gault Millaut it retailed for 24 euros (over $30) when they reviewed it.

The winery is the opposite of Bartenura, owning a mere 8 hectares planted with red vines, 11 hectares in total. I was looking forward to trying this aged mix of 50% Grenache, 30% Mourvedre and 20% Carignan.

In the glass, I found a very dark red wine, with hints of rust on the sides. The nose was perfumy with raspberry and blackberry aromas. Nina noticed butter and cookie aromas as well. On the palate, I got jammy berry aromas to begin with which soon gave way to tobacco and wood, with vanilla interspersed. The wine had decent acidity and the tannins seemed nicely integrated. The finish was a bit short and thinnish for me. I think this wine might be on its way out. It is still good, especially the beginning and mid-palate with its earthiness and rounded aromas. But the finish just wasn’t up to par. If you have a bottle, you might want to start drinking it soon…

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

A Bit of a Detective Story: 1989 Kaseler Nies’chen Riesling Auslese

1989 SMW Kaseler Nies'chen Auslese

1989 SMW Kaseler Nies’chen Auslese

This post is inspired by my fellow bloggers’ writings in the Monthly Wine Writing Challenge #3, which just concluded and featured articles around the theme “possession”.  A common thread in most posts was the idea of how possession of wines is only fully realized when they are consumed. But not just alone, but shared with friends, fellow wine lovers or loved ones (this theme hit me especially forceful in Anatoli’s entry as well as John, The Wine Raconteur’s piece)… My buddy Jeff, The Drunken Cyclist, posted something about how to deal with your wine possessions and I literally exclaimed in the comments section that the most important rule was not to wait for special occasions, in my view, a special wine IS the occasion on any given night. So let me reiterate: If you have a special bottle stashed away somewhere and you are still waiting for that right moment to open it, why not make tonight that night?

The articles inspired me to search my modest cellar for a special bottle that I had been keeping there for a while: A bottle of 1989 Kaseler Nies’chen Riesling Auslese (and its twin, I actually have two bottles of this wine). So much about this wine is special: I received these bottles in a special shipment from my friend ManSoo (who confided that this was at the time – spring 2013 – his favorite wine), the label itself is special (as you can see), the year is very special, especially for a German, and a more than 20 year old Riesling is special anyway…but label and bottle also caused some head-scratching, which I will let you in on in a minute. Very dear friends of ours had invited us for dinner, and I decided it was a great occasion to bring this wine because one of them loves aged Rieslings and the other loves Riesling of any kind.

As I unearthed one of the bottles (yeah, my holdings are not very well sorted at all…), I paused and looked at the label. The photo of the Berlin Wall coming down is still giving me chills. To this day, 24 years later, I remember my dad calling my brother and me downstairs so we could see the live footage that fateful night of November 8/November 9, 1989 when the Berlin Wall came down. I remember his tears, although we didn’t even have relatives in East Germany. The next days were crazy, with teachers only talking about this, no matter the subject. It was all very emotional. So naturally, the label touched a very soft spot for me.

But there is some mystery to this wine when you look closely. The bottle mentions Saar Mosel Winzersekt, a cooperative, as the wine’s shipper, not bottler. So the label was attached by the cooperative and is probably sold by the cooperative, but it was not made by it. Who made it?

The clue came when I pulled the cork: There emerged a coat of arms, and the name “Erben von Beulwitz”, which is a winery in the Ruwer valley with significant holdings in the vineyard Kaseler Nies’chen. So that settled that. The wine was made by Erben von Beulwitz winery, but somehow some of it ended up receiving this special label by the cooperative. How? I have no clue…

Then, while drinking the wine and looking at the label again, I realized that there was something else that was odd. I’ve written before about the AP number, a special number that needs to be printed on every bottle of wine produced in Germany. You can read more about it here, where I explained that concept in detail. But to cut things short: Every bottling in Germany gets a unique number and sample bottles of these bottlings have to be retained in order to ensure the quality and that no fakes are being made. The AP number’s last two digits stand for the year in which the wine was approved as wine. Usually, that is one or two years after the vintage. So for a 1989 you would expect to see a “90” or “91” at the most. However, this label shows the digits “99”, which means it was only submitted for review and approval in 1999, ten years after the grapes were harvested!

Now I am not sure whether the wine spent that long in steel tanks or barrels (which seems unlikely but what do I know?) or whether it was bottled but never labelled and therefore only submitted for review when the labels were attached…

I love these detective instincts that labels can and wines can trigger. This was a special case, because usually it is confined to checking out the vineyard and winemaker, trying to see where in particular the grapes are coming from. This one had several weird clues, and I relished investigating them. There is so much to wines!

Needless to say, the wine was really yummy. Everyone around the table seemed to enjoy it, and I had a particularly great time because I love it when my friends have one of my treasured Riesling moments. I have no descriptors or any of that sort today, will save that for a later date when I drink the second bottle. Today is just an exercise in investigative wine journalism…

Tagged , , , , , , , , ,